AI at work · Case analysis · 50 min
What goes in the tool, and who gets told
The two questions that get entry-level workers in trouble: what data was I allowed to paste, and did I say a tool was involved.
Target level: Proficient — Has functional knowledge of the skill and can apply it properly in specific on-the-job settings.
Why this design
Work a real situation from evidence to recommendation, and show the reasoning. Judgment content — root cause, tradeoffs, competing priorities, risk.
What this evidences
- data-privacy-judgment×1 at Proficient
- ai-ethics-disclosure×0.6 at Proficient
By the end, the learner can
- Policy guidance synthesis: tasks an AI assistant with aggregating relevant access-and-use policy precedents from professional standards bodies, then authors final institutional policy language drawing on that synthesis.
- Incident documentation acceleration: dictates post-game incident reports to an AI transcription and drafting tool, cutting report-writing time significantly while retaining personal judgment on all factual and regulatory determinations.
- Movement documentation support: uses AI to format and structure recorded choreographic notes into standardized notation drafts, while retaining sole authorship of the spatial and rhythmic decisions.
Session plan
- 15 minThe caseWhere this shows up: studios and media organizations, working with clients, creative teams, audiences. Conditions to expect: creative, deadline-driven, audience-centered. Entry roles this maps to: Actors, Athletes and Sports Competitors, Disc Jockeys, Except Radio.
- dictates post-game incident reports to an AI transcription and drafting tool, cutting report-writing time significantly while retaining personal judgment on all factual and regulatory determinations.
- 15 minEvidence logWork the task on your own first. Support is available, but ask for it out loud so the group hears what got you stuck.
- Tools in play: Graphics or photo imaging software, Desktop publishing software, Video creation and editing software.
- 10 minCompare readingsCompare answers before the debrief. Where the room split is the useful part — the split usually marks a real judgment call rather than a knowledge gap.
- Where did two people read the same situation differently, and what did each notice?
- Which answer would survive a supervisor asking "why did you do it that way?"
- 10 minWhat the record showedClose the loop: what changed between the first attempt and the last, and what would have to be true for data & privacy judgment to hold up on a bad day.
Assessment (17 items)
Loading your attempt…