Skip to main content
Career Readiness Studioby LER.me

AI at work · Case analysis · 50 min

What goes in the tool, and who gets told

The two questions that get entry-level workers in trouble: what data was I allowed to paste, and did I say a tool was involved.

Target level: Proficient Has functional knowledge of the skill and can apply it properly in specific on-the-job settings.

Why this design

Work a real situation from evidence to recommendation, and show the reasoning. Judgment content — root cause, tradeoffs, competing priorities, risk.

What this evidences

  • data-privacy-judgment×1 at Proficient
  • ai-ethics-disclosure×0.6 at Proficient

By the end, the learner can

  • Policy guidance synthesis: tasks an AI assistant with aggregating relevant access-and-use policy precedents from professional standards bodies, then authors final institutional policy language drawing on that synthesis.
  • Incident documentation acceleration: dictates post-game incident reports to an AI transcription and drafting tool, cutting report-writing time significantly while retaining personal judgment on all factual and regulatory determinations.
  • Movement documentation support: uses AI to format and structure recorded choreographic notes into standardized notation drafts, while retaining sole authorship of the spatial and rhythmic decisions.

Session plan

  1. 15 minThe caseWhere this shows up: studios and media organizations, working with clients, creative teams, audiences. Conditions to expect: creative, deadline-driven, audience-centered. Entry roles this maps to: Actors, Athletes and Sports Competitors, Disc Jockeys, Except Radio.
    • dictates post-game incident reports to an AI transcription and drafting tool, cutting report-writing time significantly while retaining personal judgment on all factual and regulatory determinations.
    From Umpires, Referees, and Other Sports Officials (27-2023.00)
  2. 15 minEvidence logWork the task on your own first. Support is available, but ask for it out loud so the group hears what got you stuck.
    • Tools in play: Graphics or photo imaging software, Desktop publishing software, Video creation and editing software.
  3. 10 minCompare readingsCompare answers before the debrief. Where the room split is the useful part — the split usually marks a real judgment call rather than a knowledge gap.
    • Where did two people read the same situation differently, and what did each notice?
    • Which answer would survive a supervisor asking "why did you do it that way?"
  4. 10 minWhat the record showedClose the loop: what changed between the first attempt and the last, and what would have to be true for data & privacy judgment to hold up on a bad day.

Assessment (17 items)

Loading your attempt…

Career Readiness Studio by LER.me