Skip to main content
Career Readiness Studioby LER.me

Durable skills · Judgment lab · 50 min

Collaboration & Leadership

Doing your part of shared work so the next person's part goes well. Paired with leadership, because in this sector they fail together.

Target level: Developing Moving in a positive direction in a professional career. Still learning, with room to grow around the skill.

Why this design

Work through short workplace situations and defend the call you'd make. Durable skills where the right move depends on reading the situation.

What this evidences

  • collaboration×1 at Developing
  • leadership×0.6 at Developing

By the end, the learner can

  • Interdisciplinary coordination: collaborates with production engineers and quality teams to align material specification changes with manufacturing capabilities
  • Shared experiment design: co-develops laboratory experiment plans with colleagues across materials science and engineering disciplines, integrating diverse technical inputs
  • Scientist support collaboration: works alongside chemists and engineers to provide technical assistance, adjusting own workflow to meet the needs of the broader research team

Session plan

  1. 10 minHow these are scoredWhere this shows up: manufacturing plants and production floors, working with supervisors, production coworkers, quality staff. Conditions to expect: process-driven, quality-controlled, repetitive. Entry roles this maps to: Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators and Tenders, Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders, Chemical Plant and System Operators.
    • collaborates with mechanical engineers, chemists, and procurement teams during equipment layout design and specification phases
    From Chemical Engineers (17-2041.00)
  2. 20 minSituationsWork the task on your own first. Support is available, but ask for it out loud so the group hears what got you stuck.
    • Tools in play: Spreadsheet software, Word processing software, Electronic mail software.
  3. 10 minWhere the group splitCompare answers before the debrief. Where the room split is the useful part — the split usually marks a real judgment call rather than a knowledge gap.
    • Where did two people read the same situation differently, and what did each notice?
    • Which answer would survive a supervisor asking "why did you do it that way?"
  4. 10 minThe pattern behind the answersClose the loop: what changed between the first attempt and the last, and what would have to be true for collaboration to hold up on a bad day.

Assessment (13 items)

Loading your attempt…

Career Readiness Studio by LER.me