Skip to main content
Career Readiness Studioby LER.me

Durable skills · Judgment lab · 70 min

Communication & Collaboration

Getting information to land — in person, in writing, and on a screen. Paired with collaboration, because in this sector they fail together.

Target level: Developing Moving in a positive direction in a professional career. Still learning, with room to grow around the skill.

Why this design

Work through short workplace situations and defend the call you'd make. Durable skills where the right move depends on reading the situation.

What this evidences

  • communication×1 at Developing
  • collaboration×0.6 at Developing

By the end, the learner can

  • Stakeholder briefing: presents design progress to project teams and clients using visual aids and engineering vocabulary appropriate to audience technical level
  • Cross-discipline correspondence: drafts written communications coordinating with contractors, architects, and vendors to clarify design intent
  • Energy audit reports: produces structured written reports documenting energy use, conservation opportunities, and cost reduction measures for client delivery

Session plan

  1. 10 minHow these are scoredWhere this shows up: military installations and field operations, working with technical teams, commanders, unit members. Conditions to expect: high-consequence, mission-driven, protocol-heavy. Entry roles this maps to: Aircraft Structure, Surfaces, Rigging, and Systems Assemblers, Security Guards, Aircraft Mechanics and Service Technicians.
    • translates technical vulnerability findings into written summaries accessible to both IT staff and business stakeholders
    From Information Security Analysts (15-1212.00)
  2. 35 minSituationsWork the task on your own first. Support is available, but ask for it out loud so the group hears what got you stuck.
    • Tools in play: Spreadsheet software, Office suite software, Electronic mail software.
  3. 15 minWhere the group splitCompare answers before the debrief. Where the room split is the useful part — the split usually marks a real judgment call rather than a knowledge gap.
    • Where did two people read the same situation differently, and what did each notice?
    • Which answer would survive a supervisor asking "why did you do it that way?"
  4. 10 minThe pattern behind the answersClose the loop: what changed between the first attempt and the last, and what would have to be true for communication to hold up on a bad day.

Assessment (11 items)

Loading your attempt…

Career Readiness Studio by LER.me