Skip to main content
Career Readiness Studioby LER.me

Durable skills · Judgment lab · 75 min

Critical Thinking & Fortitude

Working out what's actually going on before acting on it. Paired with fortitude, because in this sector they fail together.

Target level: Developing Moving in a positive direction in a professional career. Still learning, with room to grow around the skill.

Why this design

Work through short workplace situations and defend the call you'd make. Durable skills where the right move depends on reading the situation.

What this evidences

  • critical-thinking×1 at Developing
  • fortitude×0.6 at Developing

By the end, the learner can

  • Fuel quality evaluation: assesses incoming biomass fuel deliveries against moisture content, energy density, and contaminant specifications to determine processing suitability
  • Safety risk assessment: evaluates field inspection findings against established risk criteria to prioritize corrective maintenance actions and operational restrictions
  • Root cause analysis: investigates recurring equipment faults in hydroelectric mechanical systems to determine underlying causes beyond immediate symptoms

Session plan

  1. 10 minHow these are scoredWhere this shows up: repair shops and customer sites, working with supervisors, customers, other technicians. Conditions to expect: safety-sensitive, diagnostic-heavy, field or shop based. Entry roles this maps to: Ambulance Drivers and Attendants, Except Emergency Medical Technicians, Automotive Body and Related Repairers, Automotive Glass Installers and Repairers.
    • analyzes production, maintenance, and quality control reports to isolate the underlying causes of processing problems rather than treating symptoms
    From Industrial Production Managers (11-3051.00)
  2. 40 minSituationsWork the task on your own first. Support is available, but ask for it out loud so the group hears what got you stuck.
    • Tools in play: Spreadsheet software, Office suite software, Data base user interface and query software.
  3. 15 minWhere the group splitCompare answers before the debrief. Where the room split is the useful part — the split usually marks a real judgment call rather than a knowledge gap.
    • Where did two people read the same situation differently, and what did each notice?
    • Which answer would survive a supervisor asking "why did you do it that way?"
  4. 10 minThe pattern behind the answersClose the loop: what changed between the first attempt and the last, and what would have to be true for critical thinking to hold up on a bad day.

Assessment (11 items)

Loading your attempt…

Career Readiness Studio by LER.me